This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 17, 2019. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Boldyrev [email protected]
Description of the Change
Finally I got too tired of typing the arguments of
iroha::expected::Result::match
functions. Looking at its signature and docstring comment, I saw that the first matcher is for the value case, and the second - for the error. But this deduction did not happen, because both were just passed to some sort ofapply_visitor
, which does not care of visitors' positions. So I made a change before the visitor application, forcing the first visitor to accept value type, and the second - error type.Benefits
saves some hair on your head. just see this:
Possible Drawbacks
Usage Examples or Tests [optional]
just use
auto
type in matchers. don't forget about matchedResult
const- and ref-qualifiers: for example, if it is an rvalue (most common case), use eitherauto &&
orconst auto &
argument type in your machers.Alternate Designs [optional]